Find My Team

Submit Photos
Log in to High School OT with one click using your favorite social network:
OR
Log in using your High School OT account:



Wrong email/password combination.

Forgot password?

Register with High School OT using your favorite social network:
OR
Register for a High School OT account using our web form.
Log In
Register
Daily Schedule:
May. 19

High School Sports

Wake County athletes face possibility of pay-to-play


Published: 2011-02-03 17:55:00
Updated: 2011-02-03 22:04:36

Feb 3, 2011

During the 2009-2010 school year, Wake County Public Schools was home to 38,072 high school students. About 40 percent of them participated in at least one sport. 

That number could be lower next school year if WCPSS moves to a pay-to-play policy for high school athletes.

"That's something we're starting to hear a little about," Enloe High School football coach Ron Clark said. "It's definitely a a concern."

The term "pay-to-play" is one that many in athletics are concerned about. Pay-to-play policies around the country require student-athletes to pay fees in order to participate in athletics.

Over the last several weeks, the Wake County Board of Education has asked the public to submit suggestions of how to deal with the projected $100 million budget shortfall next year.

"That calls for some extraordinary measures, and I know that won't be popular," said board member Keith Sutton.

Among the suggestions: requiring a fee for students to participate in sports.

"You certainly hate to see anyone go to pay-to-play, but if one of the local districts has to do so, you certainly hope they do it as a last resort," N.C. High School Athletic Association commissioner Davis Whitfield said.

No formal pay-to-play proposal has been made in Wake County, but the thought of it is enough to make noise in the athletics community.

Gary Brannen has two sons who play basketball at Cary High School. "They love it," he said. "It is pretty much the focal point of their school."

Brannen said he believes being athletes makes his sons better students. If it came down to it, he would probably be willing to pay for his kids to play sports next year.

"We would probably make it work, but there are some kids out there who may not be able to make it work," Brannen said. "What about those kids?"

The kids whose families struggle to make ends meet are the ones who coaches and athletic directors are most concerned about.

"Those are the kids that need to be participating in athletics more than any others," said former NCHSAA executive director Charlie Adams. "I used to tell Governor [Jim] Hunt, athletics is the best dropout program the state has."

Studies done in the state of North Carolina show high school sports have a positive impact on student-athletes as a whole.

The most recent of two statewide studies on the impact of athletics on high school students was conducted by Gary Overton, a doctoral candidate in the School of Education at East Carolina University, who found positive correlation between grade point average and participation in athletics.

The mean grade point average for student-athletes was a 2.98, while the mean grade point average for non-athletes was 2.17. He also found that athletes scored higher on End of Course tests in Algebra (8 percent) and English (11 percent) than those who didn't play sports.

In addition, Overton's study concluded that student-athletes missed fewer days of school, had fewer discipline referrals and had a significantly lower dropout rate. In fact, Overton's study found that the mean dropout rate for athletes was just 0.6 percent, compared to 10.32 percent for non-athletes.

Gary Powers, the athletic director at Southeast Raleigh High School, estimates that at least 25 percent of his athletes may not be able to play sports if a pay-to-play policy is put into place in Wake County.

"It would have a huge impact here," Powers said. "Our kids come from working-class families, and that's what I appreciate about them.

"How do I tell one of them they can't play because financially they cannot afford it? That bothers me more than anything else," he said.

Powers added that he didn't think many of them would be able to sacrifice a sum of money to participate in an extracurricular activity if the school system doesn't provide financial support.

The Wake County Public School System budget for 2010-11 allotted $914 to each of the 20 high schools for athletics. Any other money was raised from ticket sales and booster clubs.

According to Powers, Southeast Raleigh operates on a budget of about $100,000 per school year.

"It's a drop in the bucket," Powers said of the money from the central office.

The amount distributed to the schools was developed in the early 1980s to provide security at all home football games.

"You're lucky if that covers one or two games these days," said Powers. "To me, it's just not fair to ask someone to pay to do something that we preach is open to all, especially when it's not something that the county pays for anyway."

Since no official proposal has been made, there has been no discussion about the fees that athletes could be asked to play.

The Charlotte-Mecklenburg school system, which instituted pay-to-play in fall of 2010, charges high school athletes $100 and middle school athletes $50 for each season they play sports.

Even that may not be enough, said Jennifer Roberts, chairwoman of the Mecklenburg County Board of Commissioners. With a continued budget deficit, the district may cut middle school sports altogether. "It is an ugly list, and it is an ugly budget year," she said.

Around the country, some student athletes pay less than $20, while others pay hundreds of dollars for public school sports.

"We're just in tough times, and we're going to have to make some tough decisions," Adams said. "Most people have never lived through times like these."

Even so, Powers hopes pay-to-play doesn't become a reality in Wake County.

"Athletics should be open to all and closed to none, and if we have to go to a pay-to-play system, I just think that closes it off to a lot of kids," he said.

Adams described a pay-to-play policy as one of his biggest concerns while he ran the NCHSAA. "I always felt like, if any child in North Carolina, if they were properly enrolled and attending any school, that was a public school, then they had the right to play athletics."

COMMENTS

69 Comments



page 1 | 2 | 3
<prev    next>
sort order: oldest first | newest first

People, keep fundraisers in mind. The kid doesn't have to go out and get a job to play football or band, etc. Anyone can foot the bill! The more money that flows into said program, the better the quality of the program. Period.
momtek
February 4, 2011 11:54 a.m.
• Report abuse

Hello Wake County residents, welcome to the "play to play" club. Your county is the only one that has never had a reason to join; because you've never had to pay. Thanks to the generous state income taxes that all NC residents pay every year your children have benefitted & so have your wallets. Wake Co. schools have annually recieved far more funding than any other county courtesy of everyone else mandated by state law. This funding has allowed your kids to "Play for Free".

It's time for Wake Co. residents to understand thier kids are not entitled to anything more than a public education just like everyone else. As a Johnston Co. parent that "Pays to Play" @ $3,000.00 in Band Fee's ANNUALLY for 1 child in High School Band & will double to $6,000 when our second child joins his sibling at High School..........I have no sympathy for your crying & complaining. Go to your room & don't come out until you realize you & your kids are not entitled to a better way of life.
momtek
February 4, 2011 11:31 a.m.
• Report abuse

very well said, tcbnashville!!
mustainemad
February 4, 2011 11:29 a.m.
• Report abuse

"This will go down as the epitome of "penny-wise, pound-foolish." Unfortunately, the anti-athletic crowd will only realize the detrimental affects after this comes to pass. We are going to lose alot of good kids if this passes."

So when will the Pro-athletic crowd realize that it is sad commentary for us to gag at gnats but swallow elephants? Where will these "good kids" go? And please define good kids for me. Do you mean athletes? When budgets are tight there should be not be any sacred cows. Cutting teacher positions = larger class sizes. So when there are 40 or more students in a chemistry class with one teacher what will you say when someone gets hurt because they didn't have enough supervision? "Good thing we still have athletics in school or it could have been worse."
vaokie4
February 4, 2011 10:54 a.m.
• Report abuse

This will go down as the epitome of "penny-wise, pound-foolish." Unfortunately, the anti-athletic crowd will only realize the detrimental affects after this comes to pass. We are going to lose alot of good kids if this passes.
pwayscue
February 4, 2011 10:27 a.m.
• Report abuse

"Pay to Play" is an excellent way to teach your children that they should not rely on the government to give them what they want in life. This attitude of "entitlement" is silly. Do you think athletics in other countries are free? When it comes to educating your children, or handing them a ball to keep them out of trouble, a reminder to all of us parents that this is your responsibility, and not the school systems. The booster programs at most schools do an excellent job of raising monies to help these kids play because they are parent led, and I am sure they will in the future reguardless of "pay to play". If not, go out and sponsor a youth that cannot afford to play. I hope it is a statewide change, and not just in Wake county. I would also agree to "Pay to Play" and instrument, or "Pay to Join" a club.
tcbnashville
February 4, 2011 10:15 a.m.
• Report abuse

No one really seems to be "getting" one of the real costs of athletics--coach "supplements" from the school systems involved!! Believe me, if a "coach" walks onto a field, they get paid very well to do so, in addition to their regular "teacher" salary. Teachers, please do not jump me on this--you all know this is true--where is the "supplement" for all the other teachers who are not labeled "coaches" for the extra things they do out of their pocket and "spare time" for kids?????? Landscapers and groundsmen are paid, parking lots are built and repaired, custodial staff to clean up the mess--where is the "booster club" for these expenses, buying flashy scoreboards???? Let the boosters pay for the REAL expenses to a school system for sports if they think it is "necessary"!!!!
mustainemad
February 4, 2011 10:10 a.m.
• Report abuse

Do sports help some students stay in school? Yes. But on the other hand there are those who toe the line during the season to stay on the team, but when the season is over watch out - discipline problems begin, sometimes an AP will cover for them if they feel the urge to try to be their buddy (cover=ISS instead of OSS), not that either will keep them off of a team, only missing 14 days will do that. How do I know this? I am an AD in a WCPSS school. The yearly cost of stipends to WCPSS is around 5 - 10 million a year. While an AD stipend is 5,000 at the top end they are paid that every season for a total of 15,000. Why is athletics so sacred? There comes a time when all areas must be cut. Does WCPSS really need MS sports? Probably not, there are many community teams that most students already play for and some have quality coaching staffs. So I am sorry to all of you who do not like the "Pay to Play" option but it is time for the fat calf to go on a diet.
vaokie4
February 4, 2011 9:08 a.m.
• Report abuse

Mom2Two:

Athletics IS self supported. The booster clubs make far more money then the school system gives them. AND, if you havent noticed, Athletics KEEPS kids out of trouble. So why should Athletics be self supported? That is the dumbest thing a person can say. Deter kids from playing because they cant afford it. Wow, that is dumb.
ncstatefan215
February 4, 2011 9:02 a.m.
• Report abuse

DowzwerW:

So, would you rather these kids get out of school then go smoke weed, join a gang, have sex, etc. Or play a sport, keep them out of trouble, teach them discipline, time management, respect, etc.

Pay to Play only hinders those who cannot afford to play. Athletics is not even a strain on the budget. Do the math. BUSING KIDS ACROSS THE COUNTY IS!
ncstatefan215
February 4, 2011 8:57 a.m.
• Report abuse

While this is a very difficult time for the WCPSS, I don't see the "pay to play" as a viable answer to the budget shortfall. Asking parents to pony up with the money for their child to play a sport will only further magnify the gap between the "haves" and the "have nots", magnifying resentment and bad feelings between the two economic groups. At a time when the school system is grappling with the issue of diversity, this is not the time to exclude kids from playing the sport they love because their parents can't afford to pay for it on top of everything else.
jgunn
February 4, 2011 7:38 a.m.
• Report abuse

There is too much drama about these and other necessary cuts. We are obligated to provide an education for students. Period. Whether we are talking diversity, which is certainly an admirable goal, or about participating in athletics, which certainly develops character and good fitness as well as scholarship opportunities; we have lost sight of the budget we have stuffed these in to...the EDUCATION budget. We can't afford to have them there and they are not costs of education. Yes, they are worthy causes, but they are not direct education and as such, have to be on the chopping block. There are other ways to achieve the goals of each of these aspirations, including pay to play for athletic programs. Athletics are EXTRAcurricular.
dowzerw
February 3, 2011 11:25 p.m.
• Report abuse

jdupree -

WCPSS pays for coaches supplements (which are no more than $5,000 and most below $1,500-$2,000), just like they pay for the supplements of band directors, drama directors, etc. They're all classified as "extra duty" pay - as are athletic directors that you mention.

WCPSS does NOT pay for the maintenance of facilities - that is left up to the booster clubs. There are NO full time coaches. All coaching positions are considered "extra duty" and receive supplements.

And I have never heard of a "compliance officer" at any high school. The eligibility duties fall to the athletic directors and coaches.

I think the biggest problem here is the fact that people making arguments are misinformed about how this works. The county spends very little money on athletics.
Nick Stevens
February 3, 2011 11:24 p.m.
• Report abuse

PS add to that cost a compliance officer at most high schools that just deals with ellegibility and medical insurance for athletes.
jdupree
February 3, 2011 11:17 p.m.
• Report abuse

The alleged $18,000 is grossly under estimated. Most large high schools have an athletic director that either does not teach or teaches very little. Add to that several coachs of both sexs, some full time, some teachers with a supplement. Add to that facilities, utilities, transportation and you see it is a big expense. Yes it teaches some values to some/but not all children.
jdupree
February 3, 2011 11:15 p.m.
• Report abuse

I totally disagree with requiring students to PAY TO PLAY! If this happens we will find that some schools will have more athlete's than others! Alot of kids learn their TEAM building skills, RESPECT, etc. from being part of a TEAM. Kids are getting scholarships to colleges that were probably not an option! Eventually we're going to be charged to send our kids to school -- then there goes FREE education!
Rhonda
February 3, 2011 10:22 p.m.
• Report abuse

ptfm922 - I wont knock the band supporters because those kids make a lot of sacrifices to do what they love. But I agree 100% with everything else you said. I work with and coach at-risk youth everyday. I have had my kids tell me with all honesty that if it wasn't for our program that they would in jail or gang banging. If you give a young person an opportunity to do what they love, they will not let you down. The state cannot let this happen, it would be a grave injustice if they did.
vaderscustoms
February 3, 2011 10:22 p.m.
• Report abuse

What's is the hubb bubb about. We have the "Education Lottery" Easley pushed that through saying that would be the solution to all the education issues. Besides, if they instate pay to play and they make a profit or excess, the legislature with just use that money to balance the budget.
mudmom2
February 3, 2011 10:21 p.m.
• Report abuse

Casting aside the points that already show how terrible of an idea this is, other ramifications will arise as well. If high school athletes must pay to play then schools with higher average income bases will have an upper hand due to the fact that schools located in poorer areas will not be able to fill rosters, due to athletes not being able to play because of funding. I'm sure some type of financial aid will be created, but honestly if 3/4 of a team require aid, the schools will end up losing money instead of gaining unless they intend to sacrifice kids that aren't fortunate enough to have the money needed. I agree with ptfm922 in that kids who can't afford to play won't, which is going to take away one of the few reasons for them not to get into trouble. This is a desperate idea and would cause more harm than good
wolfpack2015
February 3, 2011 10:20 p.m.
• Report abuse

As tax payers did we not pay for the fields Wake County uses and charges schools to use? Charges to players sounds like double dipping!
barleemi
February 3, 2011 10:11 p.m.
• Report abuse

raleighite is correct about the band. I pay for my kids year round, but it's well worth the cost. The kids in athletics pay as well. If they do not pay, they do not play. The same is NOT true of the band. JoCo in the house!!
ncplumber
February 3, 2011 10:04 p.m.
• Report abuse

Why is it always the non-athletic band supporters that don't have the first clue as to what it takes to be an athelete to make ridiculous comments?? Cry me a river! The parents are already paying and making it possible for their kids to participate in athletics. What these schools receive from the county is a joke. Can anyone on this site read? It is fact that athletics keeps kids out of trouble, builds disipline and keeps them on track with their school work!!! Ya, let's take that away from the kids that need it!
ptfm922
February 3, 2011 10:02 p.m.
• Report abuse

ooops that last line is supposed to say "we cannot ask our youth to pay"
vaderscustoms
February 3, 2011 9:56 p.m.
• Report abuse

.... if it needs paint and graphics. So when you add the price of equipment with the price of other costs it gets up into that $900 a year range, per athlete. This is something that we can ask our youth to pay.
vaderscustoms
February 3, 2011 9:52 p.m.
• Report abuse

I have to agree with raleighnite, whether it be the band or the football team having the kids pay $300-$900 a year is ridiculous. we all know that out of all the sports football is the most expensive. I coach football and can tell you that a complete set of pads will run you conservatively $450 - $500 depending on the brand, and that is from head to toe. We also cannot forget about the other sports involved in this. It is easy for us to focus on football because it gets the most publicity outside of basketball. Here is an example of what it costs to get the minimal amount of good quality equipment for a football team. 3 years ago I wrote a grant for my team and in doing the research I got a price quote from one the major equipment companies (will remain nameless) to equip and uniform 80 players, with good equipment. (not cheap and not top of the line) The quote was $48k. I also learned that to recondition a set of shoulder pads or helmet is only $25-$35 dollars depending if it...
vaderscustoms
February 3, 2011 9:50 p.m.
• Report abuse

Why should the school system make money from the students they are supposed to be serving? The athletic programs are already self-supporting. The $900 per year per high school that the WCPSS provides won't pay bus drivers and fuel for one away game for a high school football team. The booster clubs' and parents' volunteer fundraising keep these programs running. Any pay-to-play fees will be a straight tax going back to the school system and used for something else - certainly not atletics. My kids all play sports AND are in band. I'm the band treasurer and can tell you the band fees go to the Booster Club, for funding band activities, NOT to the school. Athletic booster clubs work the same way. A pay-to-play fee has no more to do with athletics than a parking fee. The WCPSS shouldn't be making money on the backs of the student-athletes. An entire football season could be funded with the salary of one assistant principal.
Reader
February 3, 2011 9:48 p.m.
• Report abuse

So, let me get this straight. The sports in Wake County essentially pay for themselves. They are certainly NOT draining the budget at $900 per school. Yet, the children that devote their time and effort to these money PRODUCING endeavors are now going to be asked to pony up to cover the inefficiencies in other areas of Wake County Public Schools? Looking that the performance of athletes vs non-athletes, you would think that people would be trying to encourage our children to play sports, not discourage them through fees.

I have an idea to help the budget crisis. How about having every single position and every single program in the WCPSS be justified for their existence? There is no way that the county is spending $1.2 billion a year without any waste and/or fraud. Go to a zero based budgeting system instead of the typical baseline budgeting. That way, everything is justified each and every year.

Oh for wishful thinking...
twetherby
February 3, 2011 9:37 p.m.
• Report abuse

The same thing goes for football teams and other sports. A pair of cleats could be as high as $80. Plus you have to feed the team members, clean the uniforms, pay for the gatorade/water, pay for maintaining the equipment, purchase new equipment, etc. Remember the story from earlier this year about an anonymous donor donating $15000 to purchase safer helmets for one of the local schools. The county doesn't provide that. And, Wake County charges its own schools to use the activity buses. So the sports teams, bands, etc. are responsible for renting the county activity buses and paying the drivers. The booster clubs fundraise all year to offset the costs.
raleighite1975
February 3, 2011 9:36 p.m.
• Report abuse

are as high as $900 a year.
raleighite1975
February 3, 2011 9:32 p.m.
• Report abuse

The schools do not charge students to be in the band, chorus, dance,theater, etc. because it is an actual class and you can't prevent a kid from taking a class because they can't afford it. So, there are booster organizations. A band booster organization provides chaperones (free) for the games and competitions, provides transportation, feeds the kids before home games and competitions, funds instrument repairs, pays for dry cleaning uniforms, paying for music teachers and coaches (i.e.,colorguard), purchases music--everything you need for a band. The county only provides $1500 or so for the band for a year. In a band with a 100 kids, that barely pays for one dry cleaning bill. Uniforms are cleaned at least 3 times a year because they have to last a long time. A set of uniforms will easily cost $40-50 thousand dollars. Once the annual budget is determined, the amount is divided between the parents and they pay their fair share. Some schools are only $300 and some...
raleighite1975
February 3, 2011 9:31 p.m.
• Report abuse

I think they should pay. I pay currently $50 bucks a sport for my kids to play. Nothing wrong with it
screwIBM
February 3, 2011 9:30 p.m.
• Report abuse

As for sports and pay-for-play. It seems at least a bit ludicrous that a program that generates money for an athletics program in general (supports itself and also funds other sports) would be mandated to then require kids that play that sport to put over money to play said sport. Part of the problem we are in is that as a society we've decided we have to fund everything and the reality is that just like we all have to do at home with our own personal budgets at some point you have to say no...I can't buy the HDTV, I'll have to stay with the old big heavy 32 inch that does a fine job and oh by the way I probably shouldn't be watching anyway. We have to start doing that as a society as well! But that said, if football goes out and via their gates on Thursday and Friday nights along with booster money funds itself in addition to field maintenance then I just don't see why kids wanting to play football should have to pay.
durhamfbfan
February 3, 2011 9:30 p.m.
• Report abuse

Hot topic it appears! So much can be said on this topic. First - as for some band programs having to pay...please clarify what you mean by paying? Are there caveats to who has to pay, ie instrument, no instrument - last I checked instruments are fairly expensive. Second - How much 'income' does marching band bring into the school? I'm willing to concede that some of the gate on Friday nights is solely there from band parents.
durhamfbfan
February 3, 2011 9:22 p.m.
• Report abuse

I agree with 3forme - I'll pay a little extra to help out. Athletics has a positive impact on so many levels. Help now or pay later for sure...

(I hit add too fast last time.!)
leafan
February 3, 2011 9:12 p.m.
• Report abuse

I
leafan
February 3, 2011 9:10 p.m.
• Report abuse

read people read...the school system only contributes 18,000 for high school athletics..maybe we should just go ahead and give that to the new superintendent and do away with all the sports..we could lease the playing fields to goat farmers for extra income..
3forme
February 3, 2011 9:10 p.m.
• Report abuse

be glad to sponsor a needy athlete...pay now or pay later..
3forme
February 3, 2011 9:06 p.m.
• Report abuse

OMG, People are you even thinking about what you are saying? We are talking about our youth. If it wasn't for these sports programs the majority of these kids would be locked up in jail. For most of these kids sports is the only way some of these kids are going to go college. Now don't misread what I just wrote and say that sports are more important that education, they are not. But if we want our youth to get a higher education, sports may have to be the vehicle they take to get there. And, for the guy that said his got cut from the team there are programs out there in the community that will help him get better and learn his/her sport so he/she can get onto the high school team. Oh by the way they are free programs. People get a grip, if we lose the our sports programs due to pay to play rules are youth will suffer dearly.
vaderscustoms
February 3, 2011 8:56 p.m.
• Report abuse

While watching high school football is fun, something has to give somewhere and I'd rather it be sports than a math or English class that goes away. The danger? Obviously, only the kids who can afford it will be able to play sports; the poor kids won't. It's also a disturbing trend that sports in school has become a "farm club" for professional sports. High school sports prepares kids for college sport and college sports are nothing but a show ground for pro scouts. It's be nice if that went away.
rickbanet
February 3, 2011 8:35 p.m.
• Report abuse

Mom2two - "Pay-to-play gets my vote (and I have two kids that would have to pay.) Schools should spend the money on academics and athletics, band, chorus, etc. should pay for itself."

I thought this was the dumbest thing I'd ever heard of, but the way you put it, it gets my vote. Schools SHOULD be about academics FIRST and extra-curricular activities last; and anyone who wants to take part in those extra-curricular activities should have to pay.

Perhaps the schools can find a wealthy mentor to pay for those who are unable to, to set up a trust that will pay for those that qualify for low incomes, etc.
RB-1
February 3, 2011 7:55 p.m.
• Report abuse

Pay-to-play gets my vote (and I have two kids that would have to pay.) Schools should spend the money on academics and athletics, band, chorus, etc. should pay for itself.
Mom2two
February 3, 2011 7:53 p.m.
• Report abuse

Both of my boys played football. We paid $75 each just for meals b/4 the games plus we had to buy all of the workout items plus there dress shirts ect. you do the math for four years. I am glade both are in college now. I want even write about the other sports they played and $$$$$$ for them ..
redknightsnc12
February 3, 2011 7:44 p.m.
• Report abuse

This is not so much about ALL sports as it is about football and maybe basketball, to a lesser extent. Tennis, golf, swimming, gymnastics and other sports have always required a substantial investment from students/parents. And yes, band and other non-athletic activities have always been "pay to play". Requiring students to pay for, at least part of, non-academic activites is a good idea. Requiring parents to assist in fund raising projects and volunteering time to support programs as part of student participation would be a good idea, also. The purpose of a public education is not participation in sports. I would imagine that one of the biggest opponents of this would be the NCHSAA.
arnold54
February 3, 2011 7:40 p.m.
• Report abuse

well said Raleighite..
3forme
February 3, 2011 7:36 p.m.
• Report abuse

and sports don't teach any of those band skills? By the way football is probably the only activity in high school that pays its own way.. the 3 million bucks this would raise(if every person in high school participated) is hardly more than a drop in the bucket to the overall budget.. Lt's cut som of those high end administrative salarys and see how much we can save..I'm sorry, i forgot that's the"sacred cow" we can't toch...
3forme
February 3, 2011 7:33 p.m.
• Report abuse

This seems fair as long as the fee is reasonable and the child could ear it through a part time job, cutting grass, raking leaves, baby sitting, ect. Why should a parent of a non-participating parent or a childless adult support athletics anyway. This si an extra curricular activity. Band and choras should be treated likewise.
jdupree
February 3, 2011 7:31 p.m.
• Report abuse

Okay..I'm tired..so someone with an analytical mind please take a look at WCPSS' budget for this year. Because according to the budget, the system has only allocated $897 per high school and $2620 per middle school for athletic funds. Of course there's the extra duty pay, but it's only $3000-5000 depending upon length of service for football coaches & athletic directors. And they're on the high end. That's not much considering all the hours they put in. Bottom line, people stop assuming that the county is spending a lot of money on athletics, bands, or any extracurricular activities. Band parents, chorus parents & sports parents are already funding these activities by paying out of pocket or working concessions at RBC, Walnut Creek, selling fruit, plate sales, etc. Essentially, Wake County is going to tax the very people who are already funding the programs Wake County stopped funding years ago.
raleighite1975
February 3, 2011 7:31 p.m.
• Report abuse

Way too much emphasis is put on sports in school. If the emphasis was actually back on getting educated we would be a lot better off.
waffleofdeath
February 3, 2011 7:29 p.m.
• Report abuse

yeah let's do what the might Char mec district does...they are not exactly a shining example of how to get it
3forme
February 3, 2011 7:24 p.m.
• Report abuse

It's about time! For years, band members have paid much more than $100 each in order to participate and represent their schools in front of much larger audiences than a piddly Friday night football game. The music programs teach discipline, teamwork and other skills that will stay with the students throughout their lives. I'm not really worried about the kids who can't afford to play ball. The booster clubs or "private donors" will take care of that and start that athelete down the road to that entitlement mentality.It's about time atheletes were treated like everyone else.
lonewolf2735
February 3, 2011 7:17 p.m.
• Report abuse

page 1 | 2 | 3
<prev    next>
sort order: oldest first | newest first

This story is closed for comments.

Our Take
More Our Take
  1. Chris__Edwards: #Braves are on TBS today &amp; in a rain delay... If only Skip, Pete, Joe &amp; Don had the call, all would be right with the world.
      — Sunday, May 19, 2013 1:56 PM
  2. highschoolot: RT @AD_cghsnc: Soccer change: 3A East Final (Gibbons vs White Oak) will be played at Gibbons this Tues.,5/21 at 6pm. #NCHSAA @PrepsNow @hi
      — Sunday, May 19, 2013 11:45 AM
  3. highschoolot: Slideshow as East Chapel Hill takes down Charlotte Catholic in the girls LAX championship: http://t.co/TPi9o7cVij
      — Sunday, May 19, 2013 11:12 AM
  4. highschoolot: Slideshow from the boys LAX state championship as Apex takes the win with one second left: http://t.co/J1mTcHdad0
      — Sunday, May 19, 2013 11:11 AM
  5. highschoolot: Slideshow with lots of pics from the 4A track and field state championship in Greensboro: http://t.co/O6QheOYcZT
      — Sunday, May 19, 2013 11:10 AM
  6. highschoolot: Carrboro fell to Shelby in the 2A tennis state championship: http://t.co/A6NPO1pecl
      — Sunday, May 19, 2013 11:10 AM
  7. highschoolot: Cardinal Gibbons rolled to the 3A tennis title on Saturday: http://t.co/dSyHOkup8F
      — Sunday, May 19, 2013 11:09 AM
  8. highschoolot: Millbrook's boys tennis team won a 5-4 thriller over RJ Reynolds to take the 4A tennis title: http://t.co/M3ZKpP78Ju
      — Sunday, May 19, 2013 11:07 AM
  9. highschoolot: The Southeast Raleigh girls track team edged Wakefield to win the 4A state championship: http://t.co/oszt6EcK1V
      — Sunday, May 19, 2013 11:06 AM
  10. highschoolot: The Knightdale boys track team won its third straight state championship on Saturday: http://t.co/25duIqEsDN
      — Sunday, May 19, 2013 11:05 AM
  11. highschoolot: The East Chapel Hill girls LAX team won the state title yesterday too. @ZachMayoHSOT was there: http://t.co/cwetalWkEp
      — Sunday, May 19, 2013 11:05 AM
  12. highschoolot: Here's @ZachMayoHSOT's story from Apex's last-second thriller as they win the boys LAX title: http://t.co/y9PJSoDZaV
      — Sunday, May 19, 2013 11:03 AM
  13. ZachMayoHSOT: Those East Chapel Hill girls handled things too. http://t.co/enwksmGO6C
      — Sunday, May 19, 2013 11:00 AM
  14. ZachMayoHSOT: Story/slideshow/video of the thrilling Apex LAX title win from yesterday, in case you managed to miss it. http://t.co/wgnLslYkZB
      — Sunday, May 19, 2013 10:59 AM
  15. NickStevensHSOT: We have a ton of coverage on @highschoolot from yesterday. Be sure to check it out.
      — Sunday, May 19, 2013 10:48 AM
  16. Chris__Edwards: What I've learned this weekend.. I'm ready for it to be over &amp; the guy who said absence makes the heart grow fonder must have been miserable
      — Sunday, May 19, 2013 12:49 AM
  17. Chris__Edwards: Terrific way for Bill Hader to leave SNL. One of the best Weekend Updates in a long time.
      — Sunday, May 19, 2013 12:27 AM
  18. Chris__Edwards: Amy Poehler and Steffon in the same Weekend Update. #Winning
      — Sunday, May 19, 2013 12:17 AM
  19. Chris__Edwards: Really hope SNL is funny tonight. Wasn't a fan of Kristen Wiig last week.
      — Saturday, May 18, 2013 11:44 PM
  20. ZachMayoHSOT: So the Pacers have advanced to earn the right to lose to the Heat. Is that about right?
      — Saturday, May 18, 2013 11:01 PM
  21. NickStevensHSOT: Hey @jmgl, if I win this Power Ball, I won't be at work on Monday. Just wanted to give you a quick heads up!
      — Saturday, May 18, 2013 9:02 PM
  22. NCHSAA: Great lacrosse state championship showdowns at WakeMed Soccer Park today! Awesome play by the young women and... http://t.co/TaetzyRbcP
      — Saturday, May 18, 2013 8:51 PM
  23. highschoolot: Apex wins state lacrosse championship in final second http://t.co/1AceoffVE5
      — Saturday, May 18, 2013 8:36 PM
  24. ZachMayoHSOT: A lot happened today. Catch up here: http://t.co/kcDVXQ3QoT
      — Saturday, May 18, 2013 8:28 PM
  25. ZachMayoHSOT: For the record, Wagon Wheel played when both lacrosse teams won state titles today. #GoNC
      — Saturday, May 18, 2013 8:13 PM
  26. ZachMayoHSOT: Here's the story of the Apex Cougars, who won the boys LAX state title in the final second of regulation: http://t.co/wgnLslYkZB
      — Saturday, May 18, 2013 7:42 PM
  27. highschoolot: Southeast Raleigh ends Wakefield's streak in girls track http://t.co/S1ksVUNiCb
      — Saturday, May 18, 2013 7:28 PM
  28. NCHSAA: 2013 Men's Lacrosse State Championships Apex High School http://t.co/uFXSKOsj2n
      — Saturday, May 18, 2013 7:27 PM
  29. NCHSAA: KNIGHTDALE WINS THIRD STRAIGHT NCHSAA STATE 4-A TRACK CROWN, SOUTHEAST GUILFORD OVERCOMES WAKEFIELD FOR WOMEN’S... http://t.co/nYJWoR28rJ
      — Saturday, May 18, 2013 7:24 PM
  30. highschoolot: Southeast Raleigh's girls track team ends Wakefield's streak, wins 4A track state title: http://t.co/oszt6EcK1V
      — Saturday, May 18, 2013 6:59 PM
  31. NCHSAA: SWEET’S FINAL SECOND GOAL LIFTS APEX TO DRAMATIC NCHSAA LACROSSE TITLE CARY – Senior... http://t.co/wCTlid31jP
      — Saturday, May 18, 2013 6:56 PM
  32. highschoolot: RT @NickStevensHSOT: Another big congrats to the Southeast Raleigh girls track team for winning the 4A title today, ending Wakefield's run.
      — Saturday, May 18, 2013 6:49 PM
  33. NickStevensHSOT: Another big congrats to the Southeast Raleigh girls track team for winning the 4A title today, ending Wakefield's run.
      — Saturday, May 18, 2013 6:48 PM
  34. highschoolot: Story as Knightdale wins it's third straight 4A track title; Wakefield girls come up just short: http://t.co/25duIqEsDN
      — Saturday, May 18, 2013 6:38 PM
  35. highschoolot: Story as Shelby downs Carrboro in the 2-A dual team tennis state championship: http://t.co/A6NPO1pecl
      — Saturday, May 18, 2013 6:38 PM
  36. highschoolot: Story as Cardinal Gibbons rolls to its third straight tennis title: http://t.co/dSyHOkup8F
      — Saturday, May 18, 2013 6:37 PM
  37. ZachMayoHSOT: RT @highschoolot: Story from @ZachMayoHSOT as East Chapel Hill wins the girls LAX state title: http://t.co/cwetalWkEp
      — Saturday, May 18, 2013 6:37 PM
  38. highschoolot: Story as Millbrook wins the the 4-A dual team tennis state championship: http://t.co/M3ZKpP78Ju
      — Saturday, May 18, 2013 6:37 PM
  39. highschoolot: Story from @ZachMayoHSOT as East Chapel Hill wins the girls LAX state title: http://t.co/cwetalWkEp
      — Saturday, May 18, 2013 6:37 PM
HighSchoolOT Forums
More HighSchoolOT Forums