Find My Team

Submit PhotosLog InRegister

High School Sports

Terry Sanford player's English grade, attendance in question


Nov 16, 2009

The athletic director for Terry Sanford High School told a judge Monday that questions arose about a football player's eligibility after his report card showed a passing grade in English.

Those questions are at the heart of a dispute over his team’s season and playoff prospects.

Cumberland County Judge Jack Thompson, a 1959 graduate of Fayetteville High School, now known as Terry Sanford, heard from attorneys for parents of players at the school and the NCHSAA a second time Monday to determine if the team gets to go on in the 4-A state playoffs.

One week ago, the Fayetteville school self-reported an eligibility violation to the N.C. High School Athletic Association. That led the NCHSAA to order that the team forfeit its nine wins and give up its playoff berth.

Parents of football players went to Cumberland County Judge Jack Thompson, who a granted a temporary injunction allowing Terry Sanford to play Saturday. The Bulldogs defeated Pine Forest, 49-28, to advance to the second round of the playoffs. They are scheduled to play New Hanover on Friday.

Lee Spruill, athletic director at Terry Sanford, said the player, Malichi Mills, may have not passed an English class he was supposed to, but Mills' final report showed that he had earned a passing grade at Cumberland Evening Academy.

Jody Hawley, director of information technology for the Cumberland County school system, testified on Monday that Mills' final grade in his English 3 course last school year was 54, as of June 23. On June 30, Hawley said, the grade was changed to a 78.

“Somebody manually had to override that,” Hawley said. It was unclear why the change was made, but Hawley identified Pam Stone, a guidance counselor at Douglas Byrd High, as the person who changed the grade on June 30.

"No, his grades were not tampered with. There is more to the story than is being told in there," Mills' mother, Ethel Johnson, said Monday.

As to the grade change, Cumberland County Schools Director of Activities Fred McDaniel said “it has no bearing on his eligibility. He missed too many days of school.”

Records show Mills was suspended for eight days last semester from the Cumberland Evening Program, and nine days from Terry Sanford High School.

One point of contention in the hearing centered on an agreement made by now-former principal Diane Antolak and the attorney for the Cumberland County Board of Education with Mills’ mother, Ethel Johnson. It agreed to expunge the disciplinary record against Mills for the 2008-2009 record, but it did not expunge his absences.

“You do not expunge absences,” McDaniel said. “You’re expunging the disciplinary record.”

Attorneys for members of the football team pointed out that Mills was disciplined through suspension and questioned why the absences wouldn’t be expunged as well.

David Phillips, the attorney for the school board, said “I don’t believe you can expunge an attendance record. It would create a false record.”

The attorneys suggested that if the suspension absences were expunged, then he would have been eligible to play football. The state requires that a player not miss more than 13.5 days of class.

Thompson scheduled the hearing to resume Tuesday at 10 a.m.

If he determines Mills was ineligible, Terry Sanford will have to forfeit its nine regular season wins and its playoff victory from Saturday. The Bulldogs would be kicked out of the playoffs, and they would have to return all money made from Saturday's playoff game.

NCHSAA executives Rick Strunk, Que Tucker and Charlie Adams made the trip to Fayetteville Monday morning with their lawyer.

“Decisions like these should be made on the football field, not made in some board room, and not made in some court room,” Jim Arp, Terry Sanford Booster Club president, said.

“It is not their fault. They shouldn't have been pulled out of the playoffs in the first place,” Ethel Johnson, mother of a player, said. "They deserve to be out there on the field doing what they do."

If Terry Sanford does not come out of the court proceedings on Tuesday with a win, Pine Forest will not be permitted to move on to the second round. Instead, New Hanover would get a second-round bye to the third round.

Terry Sanford principal replaced in midst of transcript probe

Diane Antolak, principal since 2006, was suspended with pay last week and is being investigated for possibly tampering with the transcripts of student athletes. She was still an employee of the school system Thursday, spokeswoman Wanda McPhaul said.

Mindy Vickers, the principal of Cross Creek Early College High School, was named to replace Antolak at Terry Sanford.

(HighSchoolOT.com Editor Nick Stevens and WRAL.com Web Editor Kathy Hanrahan contributed to this story)

COMMENTS

66 Comments



page 1 | 2 | 3
<prev    next>
sort order: oldest first | newest first

So according to you scousler the same rules apply if life. If someone goes and gets pulled over for drinking and driving, they should be allowed to grow from their mistakes and just get a slap on the wrist too? All that will lead is them drinking again and possibly causing a fatal accident. Rules and laws are there for a reason and should be followed. Everyone else at that school has to follow the same rules student athlete or not. 9 days suspension does not sound like a minor offense. If it was 3 days suspension I could maybe see that. Kids need to learn discipline. They have come to rely on mommy and daddy to bail them out and have this sense that the rules no longer apply to them. That is what is wrong with society these days. Everyone thinks they are above the law.
lhowell84
November 17, 2009 8:34 a.m.
• Report abuse

The state and school boards of education have gone too far in restricting the ability of local school officials to act in their best judgment and make exceptions when necessary. Not all teenagers mature at the same rate and some pay too heavy a penalty for minor offenses due to mandatory suspension guidelines. Not sure what sure what this kid did to merit two long suspensions but since his disciplinary record was expunged - his offense appears to be a very minor one. Missing so many classes due to suspension would make it hard to pass any course - yet only 1 course grade was adjusted. I think the problem lies with the rules in place - there needs to be room for personal growth and a way to overcome minor mistakes without the shame of long suspensions or withdrawal from an important stabilizing influence like football. The very high dropout rate among NC students needs to addressed at the level of the student not by some pre-determined written in stone code of behavior.
scousler
November 17, 2009 8:01 a.m.
• Report abuse

The blame should be on the kid who fail the course & his parents.He should have been in class like the rest of the team or quit the team for not holding his end up.To me his parents fail as a parent which tell me they dont give a flip about anything but their self just like their son.What a cheater they are.Shame on them.
bbcoach9596
November 17, 2009 7:53 a.m.
• Report abuse

I would also now want to see if this kid was allowed to practice during his suspension from Terry Sanford. That is also against the rules. And, if it was on a Friday and they had a game and he played, that is also against the rules. Terry Sanford needs to be made an example for all the other high schools in NC. If this judge rules in favor it sends out a message to every other school in NC that it is ok to report an ineligible player and nothing will happen to you
lhowell84
November 17, 2009 7:43 a.m.
• Report abuse

Why should one kid affect the rest of them you say? Because it is a TEAM sport. When I played football if one kid acted up at school, we all got called out and ALL got disciplined on the field in the form of wind sprints or up-downs, or something. You win as a team and you lose as a team. This kid aided in the wins his team received and actually suited up and played in the playoff game AFTER all of this had come into the open. To me, that is poor coaching and sends the wrong message. If I was coach of this team, that kid would have been sitting on the bench. And as for the judge, he should recuse himself off the bench since his graduation and locale could be seen as a conflict of interest and let a neutral judge handle this case. Remember, there is no "I" in team.
lhowell84
November 17, 2009 7:38 a.m.
• Report abuse

The judge is a graduate of the same school. Am I the only one who saw that. he should recuse himself, but I got good money he doesn't.
charlescook
November 17, 2009 5:47 a.m.
• Report abuse

what are the parents of the accused player saying? is there honor among thieves? the real victim right now are the academically honest players on the team that lost to TSH saturday, who should be in the second round of the playoffs!!
donalddeans29
November 16, 2009 11:32 p.m.
• Report abuse

lesvolt...all I am saying is that there is an order in place, a ruling body, if you will and in accordance with the rules of that ruling body, all who have agreed to adherence of those rules are bound by them...that is all...and if you do things right you have nothing to fear...your kid will be fine
teammugs
November 16, 2009 10:41 p.m.
• Report abuse

my kid is only 9 I dered the days of high school football
lesvolt
November 16, 2009 10:23 p.m.
• Report abuse

teammugs is that supposed to be an answer to my ?. By the way none of my children play for this team (TS) I just don't think the rest of the kids should be penalize. This is not the NFL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
lesvolt
November 16, 2009 10:18 p.m.
• Report abuse

page 1 | 2 | 3
<prev    next>
sort order: oldest first | newest first

This story is closed for comments.